Spring Break
Column: Bush not an error
Greg Sainer/Columnist
Issue date: 11/18/08 Section: Opinions
I would like to begin today by giving my congratulations to President-elect Barack Hussein Obama. This has been said many times, but it is still worth repeating: His election as the first African-American president is a huge achievement, and shows how far our country has come since the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation by President Abraham Lincoln. With that said, I would like to discuss the man Obama is succeeding: President George W. Bush.
There has probably been no president more ridiculed and mocked in his presidency by liberals and satirists alike than President Bush, other than perhaps Herbert Hoover or Richard Nixon. But the scorn hurled against those men pale in comparison to the length of the hostility Bush has had to face in his eight years as president and I would like to refute the claim that the inauguration of Obama will be the "end of an error."
First, despite the worries President Bush caused over personal freedoms with the enactment of the Patriot Act and other policies in the wake of 9/11, there has not been a single terrorist attack on U.S. soil since. According to the Heritage Foundation, nineteen terrorist attacks have been prevented since President Bush began redirecting resources and priorities in counter-terrorism operations and efforts. Some of these attacks include several separate attempts to bomb major buildings or institutions such as the Sears Tower and the New York Stock Exchange, along with the famous prevention of the Liquid Explosives Plot of Aug.2006 that would have exploded up to 10 airliners over major cities.
Secondly, even though the economy is in a bind right now, for a time the stock market saw its highest index levels ever under President Bush's economic policies. While job growth has been somewhat stagnant, and the federal deficit has regrettably risen, Bush's tax cuts for income and capital gains appear to have brought forth more investment that has helped raise the stock market to its new levels, which have only been brought down by the recent housing and credit crises.
Thirdly, President Bush's decision to go into Iraq has ended up being the right thing to do. A not very widely publicized story from this past July on msnbc.com reported that a secret mission had flown the last of Saddam Hussein's remaining "yellowcake" uranium out of Iraq and into the hands of the U.S. This version of uranium is able to be used for nuclear enrichment and therefore creating the possibility of building nuclear weapons, which is one reason why we invaded Iraq in the first place. This finding, along with the establishment of a democratic government and the near elimination of insurgency attacks more than prove that we have won the war in Iraq. As a result, President Bush's insistence that we invade Iraq was the right decision.
Although President Bush may not have been the most well-liked man to be president of the United States, his actions and efforts prove that his presidency was anything but an error.
Greg Sainer is a freshman chemistry major. He can be reached at 581-7942 or at DENopinions@gmail.com.
There has probably been no president more ridiculed and mocked in his presidency by liberals and satirists alike than President Bush, other than perhaps Herbert Hoover or Richard Nixon. But the scorn hurled against those men pale in comparison to the length of the hostility Bush has had to face in his eight years as president and I would like to refute the claim that the inauguration of Obama will be the "end of an error."
First, despite the worries President Bush caused over personal freedoms with the enactment of the Patriot Act and other policies in the wake of 9/11, there has not been a single terrorist attack on U.S. soil since. According to the Heritage Foundation, nineteen terrorist attacks have been prevented since President Bush began redirecting resources and priorities in counter-terrorism operations and efforts. Some of these attacks include several separate attempts to bomb major buildings or institutions such as the Sears Tower and the New York Stock Exchange, along with the famous prevention of the Liquid Explosives Plot of Aug.2006 that would have exploded up to 10 airliners over major cities.
Secondly, even though the economy is in a bind right now, for a time the stock market saw its highest index levels ever under President Bush's economic policies. While job growth has been somewhat stagnant, and the federal deficit has regrettably risen, Bush's tax cuts for income and capital gains appear to have brought forth more investment that has helped raise the stock market to its new levels, which have only been brought down by the recent housing and credit crises.
Thirdly, President Bush's decision to go into Iraq has ended up being the right thing to do. A not very widely publicized story from this past July on msnbc.com reported that a secret mission had flown the last of Saddam Hussein's remaining "yellowcake" uranium out of Iraq and into the hands of the U.S. This version of uranium is able to be used for nuclear enrichment and therefore creating the possibility of building nuclear weapons, which is one reason why we invaded Iraq in the first place. This finding, along with the establishment of a democratic government and the near elimination of insurgency attacks more than prove that we have won the war in Iraq. As a result, President Bush's insistence that we invade Iraq was the right decision.
Although President Bush may not have been the most well-liked man to be president of the United States, his actions and efforts prove that his presidency was anything but an error.
Greg Sainer is a freshman chemistry major. He can be reached at 581-7942 or at DENopinions@gmail.com.
The Daily Eastern News encourages on-topic, civil discussion on its articles posted online. It is our policy not to screen comments before they are posted or edit them after they are posted. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are off-topic, malicious, libelous or include excessive foul language. The DEN also reserves the right to turn off all comments on any story it deems necessary.
Comments violating copyright law will also be removed.
Users who repeatedly violate this policy will be banned from commenting.
If you have any questions on our comment policy or wish to report a comment that you feel violates these standards, please e-mail a link to the article to our Online Editor at DENNews.com@gmail.com.
Viewing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
A. Merican
posted 11/18/08 @ 6:43 AM CST
Best comedy piece I've read today.
Brandon
posted 11/18/08 @ 3:30 PM CST
So George Bush is great because the Heritage Foundation, a Conservative Think Tank, says so? Well then I am great because my family says so. Everyone look for my op-ed next week entitled "Why I rule" I will be using sources such as my mom and my old hockey coach to formulate my argument. (Continued…)
Patrick J Salem
posted 11/19/08 @ 7:06 AM CST
While Mr. Sainer's support of President Bush can be admired as principled, it is woefully inaccurate.
Mr. Sainer's mention of the attack on the Sears Tower is a case in point. (Continued…)
Post a Comment